Home ] Up ] WfMC Contact ] WfMC Members Area Login ] Search WfMC website ]
        WfMC FAQ
 


Making your e-business work  

Home

Standards
    Conformance
    Reference Model
    Public Documents
    XPDL_2.0
    Wf-XML 2.0



About WfMC

Events

Information and
Publications


Free downloads

Membership Information

Press Room

Excellence Awards

Marvin L Manheim Award

Workflow Handbook
   2001
   2002
   2003

   2004
   2005
   2006 NEW!


Associated sites:
AIIM
WARIA

e-workflow.org

Got a question?
Join our Discussion Forums
 Discussion Forum for Workgroups (WfMC-specific)

Workflow and BPM Research

BPM Community Forum
 

Frequently Asked Questions
General Database (January - October 2000)

This is a large MS Excel database of specific questions on a variety of topics, asked by visitors to our site. You have may have similar questions that can be answered quickly. Use "Find" (CTRL F) on your browser toolbar to locate key words or phrases.

horizontal rule

Frequently Asked Questions
about the WfMC Interoperability Specification

bulletAbout the WfMC Interoperability Specification
bullet Why does the WfMC insist on an interoperability specification?
bulletHow is WfMC's Interoperability specification different from EDI?
bulletWhat is the difference between an abstract specification and a binding?
bulletMail media imposes asynchronous protocols what are the implied benefits and limitations?
bullet Who has so far demonstrated the MIME binding specification?
bullet Who has presently declared the intent to support a MIME binding?

horizontal rule

Have a question not answered here? Join our discussion of technical and organizational issues in our web-based forum at www.workflow-research.de/Forums.
 


About the WfMC Interoperability Specification

The WfMC Interoperability Specification (also known as Interface 4) establishes the precise definition of all the requests and responses that two workflow engines must exchange to be capable of supporting processes that interoperate across a network. (Note: A ?network? may be a LAN, WAN, intranet, the Intranet, etc.). It defines how all requests and responses are encoded and transported across the network such that completely independent implementations can inter operate without any ambiguity. The abstract specification defines requests, responses and their input and output parameters. This specifies unambiguously the functions that each engine must be able to support. The exact coding used to transport those requests and responses is specified in a binding specification. It is only by an implementation of a binding that an engine can cooperate with another engine supporting the same binding. The implementation of an engine specific support for Interface 4 binding can be done completely independently from the implementation on others engines.

 

 
Q

Why does the WfMC insist on an inter-operability specification?

Put simply, because the market is demanding it! WfMC members are convinced that enterprises involved in workflow applications will rapidly face the challenge of automating processes that cross departmental boundaries. Continuous deployment of workflow applications in large enterprises will be possible only through the support of interoperability of different workflow engines. This in turn will promote extra enterprise networks of business processes linking multiple enterprises inside virtual enterprises. To further support enterprises in their efforts for always better and more effective services workflow engines must proceed rapidly into the direction of interoperability via Interface 4.

 

 


Q

How is WfMC's Inter-operability specification different from EDI?

EDI transfers data across the network. WfMC interoperability specification addresses data transmission as well, but its fundamental scope is process invocation, status control, and synchronization. It supports the management and execution of business processes, which is the real innovation of workflow technology, and opens the way to many forms of cooperating processes.

 

 


Q

What is the difference between an abstract specification and a binding?

The abstract specification specifies the functions and their parameters that any engine must support to be able to inter operate. In order to effectively inter operate with another engine, it must send commands and parameters encoded in such a way as another engine can interpret them correctly, a binding specification describes exactly that. By separating the binding, it becomes possible to easily specify several different bindings using different network and encoding protocols. By offering a precise abstract specification it is possible to identify and implement the functions to be supported. The only defined binding, as of March 1997, is using Internet mail as the transport mean, and MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension) and CGI for content encoding.

 

 


Q

Mail media imposes asynchronous protocols what are the implied benefits and limitations?

Benefits of selecting Internet mail as transport mechanism are the ubiquity of the interface, its network independence, and its support by nearly all platforms. Its limitations may be for real time synchronization between processes, a domain of little interest in most business processes.

 

 


Q

Who has so far demonstrated the MIME binding specification?

The Interface 4 MIME binding was demonstrated by JetForm at three large public events:

bullet Toronto Canada, June 1996, Workflow Conference: IBM FlowMark, WANG OPEN/workflow, Staffware, DEC
bulletAmsterdam, The Netherlands, October 96, GiGa conference: CSE Workflow, Computron Workflow, ICL RoleModel, Staffware, WANG OPEN/workflow
bulletOrlando, USA, March 97, LOMA conference: DST Systems, DOMUS Software, IBM FlowMark, NSI, Staffware

 

 


Q

Who has presently declared the intent to support a MIME binding?

Business Review International, Computron, CSE Systems, Digital Equipment Corp., DOMUS Software, DST Systems, FABA - Fallmann & Bauernfeind, FileNet Corporation, Fraunhofer Institut fur Arbeitswirtschaft und Organisation, Fujitsu Software Corporation, Hitachi Ltd., IA Corporation, IBM, ICL, IDS Prof. Scheer GmbH, InConcert, Meta Software MS S.A., Open Text Corporation, PPP Healthcare, SAP AG, Sema Group sae, Siemens Nixdorf Informat, Staffware.

Please contact the WfMC Secretariat if you have other questions:

 

 
Standards
Published Docs
Standards
Reference Model
Conformance
XPDL support

Wf-XML 2.0
 

Information Services
Info Services
Awards
Books
Workflow Handbook

Membership
How to join
Application
Country Chapters
List of members
Officers
Fellows


NEW!

Workflow Handbook 2006
NOW SHIPPING!



CDROM Companion to the Workflow Handbook 2005

 

horizontal rule

home | membership | standards | info | events | members only

All brand names and product names mentioned in this website are trademarks or service marks of their respective companies. Any omission or misuse should not be regarded as intent to infringe on the property of others. The WfMC recognizes and respects all marks used by companies, manufacturers and developers as a means to distinguish their products. The “WfMC” logo and “Workflow Management Coalition” are service marks of the Workflow Management Coalition. http://www.wfmc.org.

horizontal rule